>>696831You're an idiot if you think it's made up. Go educate yourself you hate-spewing ignoramus.
If it's not true give me one credible source that confirms.
Maybe 20 years ago (when you were the sperm in your dads nads playing russian roulette every time he jerked it, no doubt) it was debatable, but since the Kyoto protocol there has been substantial research done. CO2, as well as other GHG, are clearly contributing to climate change.
- Glaciers retreating
- Increase in violent storm systems
- Increased drought in areas previously not suffering from drought due to changes in precipitation levels
- Average temperature increases
to name a few.
I bet you're american, right? I don't know why it's always the americans who are climate change deniers. I hope you enjoy your capitalist consumer growth economy because that's what's destroying the world.
Also 'gasses' [sic], takes ONE S: 'gases'
>>696762Yes a marked tree for forestry use would be cut. But some chump (OP?) marking a healthy tree that won't be cut, for no reason, is a different matter. It's needlessly damaging the tree.
As for birch vs pine. A tree is a tree the same as a mammal is a mammal. Cut a piece of skin off me or a dog and it's going to introduce the risk of infection, same for a birch compared to a pine.
