>>784224>landfills are designed to stop leeching of chemicals into water courses,Shooting trash doesn't have any battery acid, which is what landfills mainly try to keep from leeching into the water supply.
>as well as harvest useable byproducts such as methane gas produced from decomposition which can then be used as a fuel source.Doesn't apply to anything contained in shooting trash.
>As well as this it's not an eyesore like random littering,I think we're talking about different subjects or probably you've never seen a real informal shooting range. It's true that sometimes informal target shooting takes place in beautiful parts of national forests, and I'd agree that these spots should really be picked up on a regular basis, but the thread is about shooting in the desert, specifically on BLM land, since that's the most common type of land where dispersed shooting is legal. I guarantee you that the only people visiting these areas are going there to either a) ride ATVs, which is destructive in itself but over a wider area, or b) shooting, which they're only doing in cleared parts of the desert with a backstop.
Literally the only people going to these desert areas where people go shooting are the people who don't mind leaving a little destruction in their wake, so I'd ask "an eyesore TO WHOM???"
>and provides a more sustainable manageable method of dealing with trash.Define "sustainable" and "manageable." I think you are, like a typical brainwashed liberal, just repeating these as buzzwords. Shell middens in secluded parts of the desert aren't any less sustainable than your typical landfill. And how are they unmanageable? Despite what you'd like to believe, most shooters do pick up their brass shell casings, and there are quite a few shooters willing to pick up larger pieces of trash that others have left.
So, in other words, you don't have any arguments?
