>>82241This isn't the right board, but seriously? Don't be such a fucking idiot. If a post is unqualified? You, me, and everyone else assumes that it was posted by a man. The English language assumes a male default. It's a theoretically not-true scenario that is statistically factual, and the only people who ever get up-in-arms about it are men who pretend that, just because it doesn't HAVE to be true, it therefore isn't, necessarily, implied.
But it is implied, and everyone knows it. And the reason is "because we can read."
We don't need white-knighting on this board, and I'm not a fan of being someone who does it, even though I'm doing it right now. But we also don't need people who make white-knighting a thing that other people are capable of doing.
If you don't reference gender in an internet post, it's because you think that "male" is the same thing as gender-neutral. It's not true, in theory. It is true, in fact. Just don't be that fuck-head, and togtfo never becomes something that can happen in the first place.