>>893394I own about 50 acres with a small river within it so whenever I feel overly free I go out for a swim/bath, that makes me fulfilled and I think anyone who would rather sit and read than do that is not in their right minds (aka too poisoned by society already). If I'm not doing that I'm either walking my dog or running around with it.
I raise some sheep so I don't have to rely on game, I just used that example to try and make the other anon think but I do kill some small miserable creatures once in a while. My country has strict hunting laws (not like I care) and my area too little game so unfortunately I wouldn't be able to go full hunter-gatherer.
I agree with uncle Ted on that, some "culture" but all culture acts like magnet, just as all other surrogate activities do. They're dangerous to human integrity so I avoid them at all costs.
>>893251>You mean the ones capable of reading? So everyone else is just disposable, right? All illiterate farm workers I've met were better people than townsfolk. Literacy says nothing about a person.
>So basically whenever you go /out/ you hunt all your food, cook using traditional methods, and all that shit, right?Unfortunately I can't live off game, it's impossible in my area because it's almost nonexistent. I kill birds sometimes and eat them raw (don't tell anyone), I cook my sheep with fire I make.
>Backpacking doesn't require the kind of outdoor skills you are talking aboutBackpacking while staying associated with modern slavery is cancer, I'm tired of seeing fucking hikers everywhere. If you like the outdoors, move there and stay there. If you think there's anything stopping you then you're delusional. I'm not trying to shame you, I'm just saying; DO IT and you won't regret it.
>and there are few places to exercise those skills left in the Western world.Pic related. Total land vs. total population around the globe. Too few places, you say?
