/out/ - Outdoors » Thread #915739

[20 / 4 / ?]

48KiB, 600x400, Ryan_Zinke-137-600x400.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 01:38:34 No.915739 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>915750 >>915753 >>915798

will he protect our federal lands?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 01:54:32 No.915750 Report

Quoted By: >>915751

>>915739
I don't know what I think about him, but the forest service and national park service could really use their money more wisely.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 19.png, 17KiB, 366x600

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 01:57:05 No.915751 Report

Quoted By: >>915889

>>915750
yes the gumbmit should hold onto as much money as possible and not feed it back into the paychecks of the american citizens and companies who work for them

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 01:59:20 No.915753 Report

Quoted By:

>>915739
A) no.
B) who the fuck is he?
C) no.

And I'm getting tired of selecting sushi on a subterranean mutation board.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 02:01:05 No.915754 Report

Quoted By:

As >our congressman he insisted he was in favor of keeping federal lands federal. We'll see if he keeps his word.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 02:02:25 No.915755 Report

Quoted By: >>915860

>Zinke "frequently votes against environmentalists on issues ranging from coal extraction to oil and gas drilling" and received a 3 percent rating from the League of Conservation Voters.[21] Nevertheless, Zinke broke with most Republicans on the issue of transfers of federal lands to the states, calling such proposals "extreme" and voting against them.[22] In July 2016, Zinke withdrew as a delegate to the Republican nominating convention in protest of a plank in the party's draft platform which would require that "certain" public lands be transferred to state control. Zinke said that he endorses "better management of federal land" rather than transfer

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 03:06:31 No.915798 Report

Quoted By: >>915859 >>915867

>>915739
Depends on what you mean by protect...

I see a lot of oil drilling and mining. But it seems likely he and Trump will oppose selling/transfer. And transfer is far worse if you ask me - once its transferred to and subsequently sold by the states, its gone and gone forever - at least with drilling and mining, it can eventually be restored albeit in a generation or two.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 05:39:58 No.915859 Report

Quoted By:

>>915798
this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 05:40:41 No.915860 Report

Quoted By:

>>915755
He's not the worst guy Trump had on his short list, but given that the list included Sarah Palin, an oil executive, a fracking magnate, and a venture capitalist, I'd say the Interior lucked out, relatively speaking.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 06:07:53 No.915867 Report

Quoted By: >>916261

>>915798
Im confused how you plan on restoring mountain tops in 2 generations.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 20 Dec 2016 08:37:06 No.915889 Report

Quoted By: >>916265

>>915751
Efficiency has nothing to do with that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 21 Dec 2016 01:55:37 No.916261 Report

Quoted By: >>916268

>>915867
Same way they got mined: bulldozers and dump trucks

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 21 Dec 2016 02:00:15 No.916265 Report

Quoted By: >>919052

>>915889
I think efficiency is neat for sure, but it's nearly impossible for the gumbmit to waste money as it's just returning it* to the taxpayers and economy from when it was stolen in the first place.

*unless it's going overseas as commerce or aid to the likes of Chiner, Israel, Africa, or Haiti

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20161203_155001.jpg, 2MiB, 2560x1536

Anonymous Wed 21 Dec 2016 02:06:31 No.916268 Report

Quoted By: >>916277 >>916278 >>916279 >>916283

>>916261
Not the same, now is it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 21 Dec 2016 02:19:15 No.916277 Report

Quoted By:

>>916268
>Not the same, now is it?
I don't know... do you have a before photo?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1281378669684.jpg, 30KiB, 451x263

Anonymous Wed 21 Dec 2016 02:21:06 No.916278 Report

Quoted By:

>>916268
it's like one giant retard cairn

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 21 Dec 2016 02:25:45 No.916279 Report

Quoted By:

>>916268
Are you saying you'd rather have it not restored at all?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 21 Dec 2016 02:38:09 No.916283 Report

Quoted By: >>916512

>>916268
Look and see "restoration" by dump truck and bulldozer.

>look
>see
>impregnate brain with truth

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 21 Dec 2016 14:27:50 No.916512 Report

Quoted By:

>>916283
Mining reclamation is pretty damn hard, especially because most invasive plants love disturbed sites, so you have to monitor it and work on it for years before it goes back to the way it kinda was before.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 26 Dec 2016 14:05:16 No.919052 Report

Quoted By:

>>916265
Tell that to the politicians at the Minnesota Capitol Building who decided it was necessary to execute a multi million dollar refurbishment of their meeting room or some shit.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches