>>4344651Yes. Is basically good enough for 70% of photography needs. Is a bit slow on the narrow end but you can just spend another $200 on an actual telescopic lens that'll be back to f/4 or whatever at 100mm.
>>4344721Canon RP, R8 or R6MkII. Going from cheapest to expensive. I don't condone the R5 or R5MkII for anyone who had to ask this kind of question in the first place. For stills go the RP and get it used and you'll have money left over to get a fucking excellent L lens like an adapted EF 24-105mm f/4.
>>4344759>Canon learning curveGo two days using it around your house or over the weekend and you'll be fine. Turn off Canon's nonsense auto optimising bullshit and keep in camera NR low or off.
>>4344875EF glass can be adpated basically anywhere. Could get 16mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm, 100mm, 200mm and above and put it on practically anything. Good resale value as well for anything you don't want to keep.
>>4345430If you go Olympus route do the PEN EPL7 or above. Older shit only has 12 megapickles and you'll feel it, along with shittier IBIS and screen. Got my EPL7 for like $300 and it's exactly what I use for daily take-anywhere stuff.