>>4385961Why would I be bullshitting, when I'm the one asking for help? I did find 2 ads for it under 200bucks that claimed it works, but they didn't reply on FB marketplace so they probably are bullshit.
But that's why I'm asking here, prices on FB MP make no sense, so I'm trying to understand what's the value of different cameras. In the same price range, I can find Canon 5 I and Sony A7 III, and I'm not convinced that they're really comparable. But sometimes people sell stuff that belonged to someone else, so they don't know the real value of it.
Someone earlier said that an a6000 is comparable to the nikon that most suggested - I can find various ads for that one, with a fixed lens, for 100-200bucks. Since I found one that looks legit for 130bucks, I might just go with that.
130 vs 200 isn't a big difference, for the lower price I get something that seems to have better upgrade paths (for Nikon, you guys were suggesting just one model that I could jump to - on sony it seems I'd have multiple gens of A7 I could upgrade to, besides "the latest, when it gets cheaper"); I wouldn't have to worry as much for the lenses (either buy FE, or buy E mount knowing they'll use cropping if I upgrade the body); the camera would be lighter and I could see the effect of changing settings in the monitor.
However, one guy was saying the APS-C format is a big drawback, and I'd need to go to the 6700. How does the A7 III compare to this mess?
