>>4398195I assume that, because I've heard multiple completely unrelated people talk about insurers dropping their family's / friend's / relative's home insurance in CA. I really don't see what's your problem. Insurance companies see huge fuel accumulation, they assess (correctly) that chance of fire is so high that offering insurance is not economical, and drop the property. There's no conspiracy, it's the most logical and obvious explanation.
The only actions these people should take responsibility for is staying in California. Which, to be fair, is pretty damn retarded of them.
