Nice thanks for sharing some are better than others, and I mean this in the best possible way as I was guilty of it as well espically when i started 10 years ago
but sometimes a photo is bad / isnt it technically like this one.
>>4423857where (maybe its your edit) but it just seems a bit unsharp and there's purple fringing everywhere on the keyboard but you have tried to save it in the edit and pushed and pulled it and vignetting ect where less is more. its a decent shot with decent composition with an interesting character but the pushed colours and over all too much editing kills it for me.
this is the only one i actively didnt like
>>4423858the bokeh is awful and distracting doesn't add anything other than I bought a 1.8 f lens and saw a girl once. think your portfolio is stronger without this one
>>4423853espically this one. the sand looks plastic and everything is flat as a pancake makes me feel hard the artifice of the photographer and I can just feel you editing these photos on some macbook somewhere when I see them.
so yeah less is more if its a good photo it won't need much editing. also I don't personally don't care for how blue all the colours are shifted.
I guess in short less is more.
overall good and I did enjoy looking trough.
