>>4437281>NTA and I shoot BIF and have never needed an ISO this highYou've never shot outdoors at night? Or exclusively use a tripod and shoot rocks and leaves? The way your argument boils down, everyone should be shooting a D80 because it caps out at ISO 1600.
>>4437283It was the fastest example I could grab. If anon wants to claim FF and APS-C are indistinugishable, it's sufficent to counter it. I have photos that are shot handheld at 12800 ISO and they look kind of like ass in terms of noise.
>>4437308Again, if you're only ever shooting static subjects in good light, yeah, your phone will do. Turns out some people actually do other more interesting shit.
If you guys want to spend nearly $1000 on a cope lens for a cope format be my guest. I'm gonna spend my money on what I want.
>pic rel, it's you three 
