>>4492832the photos are very, very low quality, about on the level of a sony rx100, maybe worse, see
>>4458580maybe up to aps-c shitter with less than ideal settings quality if they know how to use a camera, see
>>4490289but a few of the gearfag users (om5 idiot and g9ii thirdie) are irritating gearfags with obvious psychological issues, notorious for incessantly shilling these digishits as superior with a bunch of ass-backwards misunderstood math, and incessantly shilling against fuji and sony because the a7c and xe5 are really better choices than any new m43 now
one of them is "going away" which we all hope meant "committing suicide" because his incessant gearfaggotry (over $5000 USD spent, 12+ hrs per day spent between 4chan and taking the same test photo of the same tree over and over) leaked into real life and cost him his home, wife, son, and marriage
so perhaps micro four thirds can be a /dst/ copy again, full of people with $250 em5 mk2s who literally cant afford full frame, as it was always meant to be
