>>4463344Retarded take.
Keys can be made entirely unique with a salted hash of the serial number contributing to the encryption key. Nobody is going through the effort to undo that just to imitate someone's snapshits
>>4463355It would work. It's quite obvious a lot of anons here don't actually understand how cryptography works. Your method isn't exactly how I'd go about it, but theoretically it would work.
Anyone who cares can use a biometric locked yubiko (usb key) to access their TPM enabled camera (to prevent hardware fucky wucky). From there you just sign all RAWs with a key pair. I would not store the private key on the camera; despite the low chance, I'd rather just the camera have the pub key and your yubiko have access to the private key.
Essentially you'd be "authoring" your photos with a key linked to your physical sign-in device (the yubiko). I'd prefer that to be linked to an anonymous profile instead of real name etc, but keep in mind your biometrics are going to be linked to it in my suggestion. Easy solution: strip the encrpytion off anything you don't want to be traced back to you.
