>>4473787How dishonest.
These cameras are in different size/price classes, and thinness doesn't really matter because none fit in pockets. The a7c with a body cap is an awkward lump that barely fits in a jacket pocket. It's just more comfortable on a strap, doesn't bump into stuff as often, and fits in carryon bags better.
Canon might release a compact FF RF camera thats worth a fuck, maybe they can even beat the a7c, but otherwise what the fuck does the 28 go on? Is there an aps-c vlogging model I forgot exists?
Nikon's pancake is notably pretty bad. Most nikon users encourage people to skip it and buy the cheaper 28mm, for better edge sharpness, faster quieter autofocus, less vignetting, and actually being the same size because the 26mm is an externally focusing lens designed like the old 50mm f1.8 G, that comes with a "lens hood" that's actually the rest of the lens barrel plus the filter threads. You could call it a pan-fake.
Neither lumix nor sony have a considerable wide angle pancake. The lumix 26 is fixed f8. Viltrox chip tier, literally a smartphone lens, ergo, you may as well portray the even thinner viltrox chip. I don't think L mount has a "real" pancake other than the s9's kit zoom. The smallest prime is probably the sigma 45mm.
The closest things sony has to "real" pancakes are the 35mm f2.8 zeiss, 40mm f2 ttartisan, and samyang 35mm f2.8.
Honestly, now that you bring it up... with no real pancakes (just a fixed f8), even fewer options than snoy other than the s9's kit lens, no shutter at all on their compact, and notoriously shit autofocus... lumix doesn't seem like a brand worth buying. Maybe someone should revise "all cameras are good now" to "all canon, sony, nikon, fujifilm pentax, and olympus cameras are good now".
>>4473789>dslr styled blob mirrorlessIt's not even that small. Get a gf/gx/gm series.
