>>4499363>Hey listen bud. There are tons of boomers out there who say that if the enlargement shows grain or isnt super sharp, you went too far. That means the hard evidence that 35mm film is 275mp is magically wrong!Thats like saying most people agree that theres no point in being taller than 6’0”, therefore i am not 6’4”
Whats next, dated scanning tech couldnt pull that resolution out of 35mm so scanning technology has never improved? Again, there is hard, proven evidence in this thread that a 275mp scan of consumer 35mm color neg shows single pixel sized details and 1px spaces between details. It’s just grainy and lacks edge contrast.
Boomers can have their PREFERENCE, but it is an undeniable and proven fact that even consumer 35mm color negs with mediocre glass can record at least 275mp worth of distinct, pixel-sized detail in real world conditions.
It follows then that 100mp digital is only for cost saving high volume work and quality addicted amateurs who can’t even begin to shoot, process, and scan film competently enough to get 275mp out of 35mm so basically almost no one needs it when they can just git gud and stitch some scanned shots with a 24mp DSLR and 2x macro. In fact, a cheapo 120 camera scanned as stitched shots with a cheap digital would stomp all over fake medium format and piss on its face.
TLDR digislugs btfo
