>>4481820>>4481829Thing is, these comments are always come from who have never used one. They might have tried one at a camera store but never have had one in their life for a period of time.
It's like the man children who never have been with a woman shitting on women how they are suck and whores as they've been told.
They are not entirely false but women still are not complete piles of shits either.
The point: they are not making any conscious decision for wise purchase but they are buying the narrative. It is a mere consuming a narrative about gear fagging.
They're the fox and the sour grapes in Aesop's fable.
I'm not saying leica is the perfect camera for all of you.
But you don't know if it's a truly suck camera or it works with you well oppositely the narrative before you try it.
Don't be the virgin incels that saying pocket pussy is better than having sex. Because there are more in having sex than just rubbing dick and pussy for cumming.
>>4481859>its about fashion and cloutActually it's legitimate in some area. You look at the model and the model looks at you and your camera. And it effects the model
