>>4486321If it's what they ment they would've clarified on my first reply
You are being generous with the actually said
It's about the quality of criticism
You're okay with
>I don't like itI'd hope we can start asking for a little more than that, an actual why? Maybe even room for improvement
No one ever said it was a persona attack on OP, but OP also saw it as useless feedback
If the feedback you give is too poor for it to be received, you need to work on communication
