>>4486319Every photo there (except a few I didnt care for but not the point) is technically good. Great even. Well done. I forgot about every single one in about a third of a second after closing them. Every single photo looks like it would fit decently well in a wallpaper competition or a curated instagram page. Unsarcastically, nice, and well done. I still forgot about them all basically instantly, and so would literally anyone else other than yourself.
And the reason they're all so forgettable, is because your subjects are rocks leaves and skies. I like a good landscape photo, but I don't give a fuck about other peoples' landscape photos because there's nothing to them. There's no substance. Nothing special or eye catching. You spent money on the gear then read about the techniques needed. You bought the ND filter, you bought the tripod, you bought the wide aperture lens.
Don't confuse my sardonic demeanor as trying to put you down or talk you out of it, but there's just plainly nothing special about your photos.
>Looking forward to seeing your interesting photos nextI don't buy in to the nophoto arguments. If me not posting a photo is enough for you to discredit my arguments, then I am no longer interested in genuine debate.