>>4490234>You just take a look behind the lens mount.I mean before I buy it/when deciding what to buy, how would I tell?
>A modern APS-C sensor will outperform a 20 year old FF sensor in most areas except low-light aquisitionIn what sort of areas? Actual image clarity and detail, or? You say "except for low light shooting", but that's really the main thing I'm concerned about, unless camera with a newer sensor would straight up also capture more detail all other things being equal
>Yes there are spec sheets for SNR and DR per ISO value, but No, you can't really compare cameras this way. There are too many other variables.If it's quantified and I can find that information, why isn't it useful to compare, provided I'm also looking at other variables that matter like full frame vs crop sensors, resolution, IBIS, etc?
Can you explain what SNR and DR here mean in reference to ISO so I know how to read those values?
>>4490218>>4490225>>4490234Would the 5D Mk2 or the other cameras you all brought up like the 6d, 5d3 ,pentax and FF be better cameras for my use case (photography in museums with dim lighting) then rebels, at least?
Keep in mind my price range is ideally around 200, maybe up to 400 used here, though I could perhaps justify up to 600 if it's a major improvement over anything in that lower range
Speaking of buying used, what should I be looking out for to ensure the camera is in good condition? I've heard of people getting records of the amount of shutter operations the camera has been used for? Can I get info about that and how much I should be wanting/avoiding?
>FPNWhat's that?
