>>4491884Yep. Fuji just doesn't make good cameras. They're more of a fashion brand.
Real photographers are better served by getting an older DSLR. They won't give up when push comes to shove, the batteries last 10x longer, the autofocus is better than any fujifilm, and the optical viewfinder is the last stand of photographic integrity. You see the light of the scene, not a roughly calibrated screen, sneaky AI alterations, and noise reduction crammed into a tiny 1920x1080 TV with a variable framerate.
Mirrorless doesn't make sense unless you're literally crippled, do video professionally (everyone watches 720p otherwise), spending $1500+lenses on a newer canon RF/sony FE cam, and sort of bad at photography. For everyone else, there's high quality DSLRs like the Nikon D750 and Canon 5D mark III.
>inb4 mirrorless babbies bely their over-reliance on auto-everything everything-detect everything-tracking AI autofocus>>4492052Dishonesty.
