>>3013462>focusing extremely accurately with manual lensesThis is no more of an argument than "my sytsem is better because it has more lenses" when 50% of the lenses are overlaps.
>window does not represent current exposure or limitations of your mediumYes it does, there's a fucking light meter in the same window which also shows your current settings.
>useless in low lightDefine "useless" and for that matter define "low light". If there's available light, use it. If there's practically no light at all, your image is likely not going to turn out good unless you're trying to shoot astro or some shit.
>doesn't give an accurate previewWow it's really hard to get a fundamental understanding of aperture from reading a few lines about it, and then going out and seeing for yourself the way it affects how much is in focus, as well as what you can expect to be in focus for your given setting. You sure need a fucking camera to show you everything, don't you?
>expect things to look REALLY darkIf it's REALLY dark and you're shooting things that require stopped motion you're shooting wide open or close to it. And once again, estimating how your given aperture will affect the final image is not something so substantial it really needed a battery draining image preview to do it.
>the rear screen which is likely to have light glaring off itSeriously? You spent your whole post bitching about low light but now all of the sudden there's an arbitrary light source directly behind you that's visible every time you try to look at the rear screen? This kind of straw grasping is how I know you're full of some bullshit m8
>massively limits lens design and anything wider than 40mm will be oversized and underperformingOversized by what standard? Underperforming...by what standard?
>manual gearboxes blah blah blahOh fuck me, it's another bullshit car analogy/strawman.
>toxic masculinityYou waited until the very end to signal this as a troll post? Good job.
