>>4204759You've never owned the K-1. I have. Pixel shift on it is a waste of time if anything moves (wind, water) and you really have to spend your time fixing the motion artifacts. Pixel shift is more of a film scanning feature. Also, the gains on small sensors are more noticeable, and I don't think the K-1 has the best implementation. Maybe it's just held back by how pentax uses a rebranded tamron lens.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/pixel-shift-shootout-olympus-vs-pentax-vs-sony-vs-panasonicIt's also an awful camera to live with for almost everything else - and pixel shift isn't even the biggest reason to buy it since it's rarely used. Astrotracer and IBIS are, because otherwise the lens selection is overpriced and garbage at the same time, the UI is bad enough for me to like sony menus, and the autofocus tracking is nonexistent.
You've also never taken any pictures except of a blurry cow and a blurry leaf so here is a blurry bug as tribute. Imagine listening to cANON, he doesn't post photos lol.
>>4204775By something nice I don't mean going all out on $2000 body shit tho, just watch and wait as the prices on used Z6 IIs, A7RIIIs, A7Cs, X-T4s, a6600s, etc drop then pick up a nice lens or two.
And remember, if it's out of production and "legendary" (or fuji and retro looking), there's a small chance it will sell for as much or more than you paid.
