>>4014806>Arguing it's not useful because it's not sufficiently advanced for your taste is such an utterly autistic thing to sperg out aboutnot for my taste but literally not even close to being for the same use case
>I suspect your position is an emotional one rather one based in logicI'm not the guy that thinks I need ibis to "unlock the potential of my lens" but I really enjoyed this portion of your completely good faith post
>Your photos explain why you think the way you do though lol. If you're smearing denoise to the point where the entire image is banding and broken I guess you might not care about in camera exposure settings.Who's talking in bad faith now. None of these are my photos I pulled them all off instagram and they're all from a gfx50 but pretty much fucked by jpeg compression
>'It's not worth it because I don't think it's worth the money for the performance yet' is a valid arguement. 'IBIS is not useful because it wouldn't help me for my photography' is not.more bad faith strawmen
I accept your concession, have a nice day bro
