>>3474701I just scrolled to the bottom of his thread and saw the unedited photo.
His technique is awful and compensated for badly by his horrible editing style.
isi's photos are straight out of camera on the other hand.
I don't think this is even comparable. Just look at this garbage. The only thing this guy has over isi is that he attends shows with more hip punk fashion and larger crowds.
As a person posting on a photography board, you should be capable of telling the difference between having better subjects, and having better technique.
I should know better than to expect you to, though.
