>>2887966>Wow dude, I thought we were laying off the demonizing, Didn't need to call me a retard to make a point, when you could clearly have without it.You not understanding the point of a conversation and interpreting hard facts as personal attacks doesn't mean others are "demonizing" anything.
>But yes, this example illustrates of such a situation, but everything you said before didn't mention this kind of situation. You could've been done with the argument from the very first post.You still have not even idea how the lightmeter in your camera works, the AE modes are doing exactly what they're designed for and the case illustrated in that post is basic shit you should have known by experience BEFORE even continuing this trainwreck of a conversation revolving around an indefensible point: the defending of the missing of one of the most basic, essential features on an slr, which obviously gives you no advantages at all while leaving you with just the disadvantages of it and you don't even need that example to understand it, it's just logic, therefore you aren't defending a technical point but just your poor choices and understanding of the matter, that's why you're taking personally things that are just facts .
>>2887993Oh we got another one, cool, let's start over and over again.
