>>3166765>shooting medium format>will take me years of continuous use to run up costs as high as a full frame digiturd and lenses >I don't shoot close to half as often in the winter time, so my non-linear cost curve actually takes more time to get anywhere close>ten years from now I will be so busy with kids that the cost curve becomes even lower for me as I shoot less>I ultimately pay less than you even after all those years>my camera appreciates in value as more people shoot photography with fewer functioning film cameras>you paid for the entirety of your camera's life upfront, minus future service costs>your camera is a depreciating assetYeah I have to pay for the cost of my camera over time and wow, that's a good thing compared to shelling out thousands up front, especially because it's a non-linear cost curve.
Then again, if you're stupid enough to shoot anything but entry level digital, you probably aren't intelligent enough to understand why your decision isn't economical vs film unless you're working weddings and shit.
>mfw I get Stacy while you get some ugly Filipino girl 