>>41279201. B&W f4 shot is shot with a 28mm Zeiss Otus APO and the staircase f4 shot was shot with a 35mm Voigtlander APO Lanthar ASPH
2. Yes, I do obviously shoot lower apertures like f3.5 or f4 when I'm not using strobes and when I lack light so I don't have to bump up ISO! Holy shit! Who would have thought?! Point is that you don't even need ''mUh BOkeH'' to create stunning images and art, you can create 10,000,000 times better images with little to no background blur, shooting at f6.3, f8, f11, f16 or even god damn f22.
3. My man, my brother, I shoot Hasselblad X and Sony E, the only thing cheap on my gear list are the camera bodies I own. I don't own a damn 70-200 because I don't need a damn 70-200 and no 70-200 in existence compares to any lens I already own. So why the fuck would I waste money on a 70-200?! Just the main two lenses that I own and use for 90% of my work (a 55mm and a 135mm) are worth almost 10,000 EUR and that's not counting in the entire Zeiss Otus, entire Schneider Kreuznach and entire Hasselblad lineup of lenses, two DZO lenses and two Voigtlander lenses that I have in my safe.
So explain why the fuck would I use a god awful 70-200 instead of my Schneider Kreuznach, Hasselblad or Zeiss glass?! Explain that shit to me please because I don't seem to understand your logic.
