>>3405063cont.
Yearly book should be there to recognise people that actively contributed to the board by posting their pictures. I can name a lot of them out of the top of my head for this year alone: alex, car posting anon, astrophotography anon, newb from germany that filled a whole thread with his pics, natureguy, 60's slides uploading anon, dyi lens anon, scotish a6000 anon with asylum and forests pics, technically correct trip with his whore pics, film anon from driling platform, sugar, muhmega with his green lr filter, suicidal anon from korea, kurwa, infrared posting anon, portraits posting anon with 1d x, military anon with fuji... I dislike half of them, got into serious arguments with a few of them, don't even particulary like what they do. But that's entirely besides the point. They post here! It is what we have! Personally, I'd even consider chosis, but he'd be the only one who I'd put up for discussion. I don't think anything else is even negotiable if you want to be taken seriously. People that posted memorable pics and memorable threads matter. I'm sure there are others, I'm sure I forgot some, and while I'm here too much, I'm not here 24/4, so others anons could but in, but these kinds of posters are the only ones you should consider, and only for the pics that were posted here. That should be your only rule.
