>>3401779>how do you know when a sony fanboy is lying?>it's whenever he makes a postCanon never lost the FF market (pic related).
The Canon 70-200 f/2.8L II is visibly better at every focal length than the 70-200 f/2.8 GM OSS with the single exception of 100mm (but muh dxo! MUH...D...X...O!!!).
https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=687&Camera=979&Sample=0&FLI=3&API=0&LensComp=1137&CameraComp=1106&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=3&APIComp=0Of particular note is that the Sony GM lens looks like SHIT at 200mm. It's not even as good as the 70-200 f4L (the older, non-IS version) when both are at f/4. It also gets its ass handed to it by the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 G2.
You're nobody's mom but you are a bitch.
>muh firmware fix>muh northrup videoCry more faggot.
