>>3478465The argument by that moron is that digital is better in every way.
>Digital is objectively better at capturing fine detail and color information as accurately as possible, especially in low light. If you put some real effort into it you can turn any high fidelity digital image/video look identical to a film capture. Shoot film because you like the process, not because of some delusion that it resolves more detail or "has soul" or whatever. You should be shooting film because you enjoy using a film camera, developing, scanning, and the fact that your images have a certain look without further editing.I've put forward countless examples already why he is wrong in this, yet he keeps dodging the topic. It's simple challenge. I post film shots, you post digital shots that blow my film shots out of the water! And no sperging out with piss bottles.
