>>4106765Melbourne, Australia.
>>4106769>Do you have a drum scanner at home or...?I wish
>Isn't drum scanning like brutally fucking expensive?Yeah it's definitely not cheap. I've started going to a lab in my city that offers 1hr of drum scanning for $55. If I choose to only scan and take the 3F/TIFF files then go and edit them at home I can get through quite a few negatives otherwise if I'm editing them there I can get through maybe 10 photos in 1 hour.
>Also, is there anywhere you post the drumscan results?Not sure what's the best way to go about sharing the full res photos since they're like 300MB+ each. But this might help give an idea of how much detail the scan can pull out of a 6x9 negative
>>4106966Gold 200. I gotta try shooting a long exposure with Ektar someday