>>3353968(cont. YET AGAIN)
>>3352391 *ahh gorgeous. very shiny. sorry if you were hoping for criticism, but the ladybug distracted me and i cant think of anything i would change. im just sort of staring at this now.
okay i thought of something. the leaf/grass/whatever it is in the foreground is pretty distracting, especially with how close it gets to the edge of the ladybug's outline.
>>3352422great composition. i dont know if its actually good but i was excited to click this photo as i typed critiques for the couple photos before this one.
blurriness distracts me, but if you have a version where the leaves are more sharply defined, then youre good. im assuming this is just resized.
>>3352549 *cool place, but im not sure what your intended subject is. i think you could split this photo in half and the top and bottom would stand pretty well as their own photos. do you have a larger version? i wanna make the bottom half my background, if thats okay with you.
>>3352668it took me way too long to realise there were two people in this image. the green mug doesnt look good with the other colours and im trying to figure out which person the jeans leg belongs to because it doesnt look like it connects to the person not holding the mug.
>>3352837INTERESTING SUBJECT! ive never seen circuitboard macrophotos before. please change your angle though. try photographing the thing in a way that will get the whole thing in focus, or choose a subject that is small enough that it doesnt matter. also, it's easier to care about macro photos if you find subjects youd be interested in anyway.
>>3352838 *fuuuck this is impressive. i cant believe you kept so much of this leaf in focus. i think part of that is just that it seems pretty flat, but i just. wow. i think most of my awe comes from looking at this and knowing that im not at this level yet. i have more to say.
the reaction image applies to photos with a * by them, since there were lots of good ones this time around.