>>4049139>How many is that in megapixels?around 5184×3404 at 3600dpi
so like 17 megapixels? dunno really
>Ah fuck that's a bit too long imo.a single frame at 3600dpi takes like a minute and a half to scan, so a whole roll takes around an hour to scan, and all the film loading and advancing has to be done manually
>Overall are the scans better?I've never compared them to DSLR scans, but comparing them to flatbed scans, the opticfilm pulls out considerably more detail out of the film, like a lot of fine details that the epson v600 can't even capture.
I imagine a DSLR with a nice macro lens would be able to do equally good, if not a bit better.
picrel is a crop at full size of a 3600dpi .tif scan with no sharpening or any other processing. it's expired FP4+ that got quite pop'd grain at dev. the opticfilm can easily pick up the grain quite sharply.
