>>2665517>but it would've been impossible to captureFrom where you were standing, at that focal length, sure, but had you moved to the right, and spun a bit to the left, or zoomed in a bit, or gotten up higher, or down lower, you could have very effectively minimized distractions. Getting lower would also have made the car seem more imposing and impressive, rather than looking down at it.
>what are some good purposes behind tilting the camera?There are almost none. Usually it's to give a feeling of disorientation to match a mood or action in the frame (drug use is the most cliche version)
>What do you mean by this, exactly?I mean that you were trying to take a photo of an awesome car, because it's an awesome car. It's sleek, powerful, expensive, exclusive, fast, dangerous, etc. Yet you didn't make any choices to impart any of those qualities into the frame. You merely saw a nice car, and snapped a photo of it. All photos are technically documents, sure, but you can use the medium and your knowledge of light, and control of perspective and distortion to shape the way your viewer experiences your subject.
>Pic (render) relatedThe angle is low, the perspective is close, the car looks like it's standing over you. It looks fast, and impressive, and powerful. The lines are clean, and the entire composition is there to not only show you the car, but to make you feel a certain way about the car. You aren't looking down on it, the way you look at a kitten, or your kids, you're looking up at it, like something large, powerful, impressive, imposing, etc.
