And here's a one off from when I was walking the dog this evening that I just snapped with my phone. But having posted my shit, I'll reply to some shit.
>>3400641>>3400595I actually quite like this but I wish that the little plant was a bit more in focus. I really like the idea though, almost like a naturally occurring terrarium, if that makes any sense. Looks like you went a little buckwild with the editing in
>>3400595 though, which is fine, it just looks a little over-sharpened. Nice job though.
>>3400640Christ, that's a long photo but I'm sort of glad that it is. Lots of different stars to look at and you get a neat night-sky gradient effect. I know basically fuck all about these long exposure shots but I've always enjoyed them. If anything, I sort of wish that there was a bit more landscape to balance the picture out toward the bottom. I still really like it though.
>>3400531Not sure what you were going for, I like the trees. That said, cool it with the sharpen slider/tool. It looks like you're trying to make a stencil out of the picture.
>>3400473Right one is definitely more interesting.
>>3400428Personally, there's not a lot in this photo that catches my eye. Some drab buildings that are off kilter and in a weird perspective. You might benefit from fucking around with the perspective tool in Lightroom or even VSCO.
>>3400336Well if you know the colors are bad, why would you leave it that way? It's at least an interesting subject but the colors are just blasted and off-putting.
>>3400334Simple, enjoyable to look at, if not a bit over saturated.
>>3400117Tricky. It's a cool looking room so congrats on finding it but it's a wildly dull and off-putting shot. It looks like you came to repossess the house and your boss told you to take pictures of the rooms so that he could see what they looked like. Try and spend some more time editing and decide what you're trying to show with your shot and what you want to highlight and potentially discard.
