>>3538694>>Clark cites show a range of 0.59-0.78 arc minutes as average for human vision.>Even at his lowest end, .6 arc minutes, you would not be able to tell the difference between 72dpi and 300dpi from 5 feet away, because the pixels at 72dpi at that distance would be the equivalent of .23 arc minutes, 1/72 = 0.013889"
At a distance of 60" that = 0.79578 arc minutes (pic related). That's not the only part you got wrong. Here's the key part you're missing:
VISUAL ACUITY TESTS USE CYCLES. WHETHER WE'RE TALKING ABOUT LINE PAIRS OR STROKES IN A LETTER, YOU NEED ***TWO*** PIXELS TO REPRESENT A CYCLE, A BLACK LINE ON A WHITE BACKGROUND. That means for a person with a visual acuity of 1 arc minute you need pixels that are 0.5 arc minutes or smaller in size to represent detail at the limit of said person's vision.
You can shut the fuck up now you fucking retard.
>>3538713>Sorry, error in my mental math, had to use a calculator:You're getting it wrong even with a calculator.
>>3538713>Fucking IDIOT.Yes you are a fucking IDIOT. A fucking arrogant ASS who thinks he knows more than an imaging scientist/engineer and therefore won't even bother checking to see if he's making mistakes before opening his dumb arrogant mouth on a forum. You accused me of not double checking the math in the link but you don't even know how to perform the math.
