>>3360763That samyang lens on an a7 has a higher resolution than ANY fuji body and ANY fuji lens.
Our worst is better than your best.
>getting it done in camera.Takes just as long, you still have to upload them to a pc before they go on the internet, and you could run them on a batch process with a colour profile as you do so.
On sony they have perfectly good jpegs, but you can also do multi section long exposures in camera (you can set say water to 30 seconds and the sky to 10 and it will automatically blend them in camera), you can use your phone as a remote viewfinder and trigger, and you can import the shots to be run through vsco, arguably better than the shonky over saturated, crushed blacks of fuji jpegs.
>>3360766Crop does = cheaper though, glass is about 2k a kg, and the larger the lens element, the higher percentage of waste from grinding it. If the fuji has the same optical design as canikon, canikon would need over 3 times as much glass to start with. And yes, the fuji has worse iq, it's on a half size sensor, unless you think it's going to resolve twice as much as the canikons, lmao.
>2.8 is 2.8Except on crop you get the appearance of one stop slower bokeh and one stop more low light noise. Name any other metric that matters wrt aperture. Dingus.
Plastic has less thermal expansion and doesn't deform nearly as easily, this is better for lenses.
Show me the -5.4, I've attached a ff 24mm f4 shot on an even bg without correction applied, does that look like a 5 stop drop to you?
>please stop coming back with facts and logic, I'm starting to look a bit sillySorry pal, you started this.
>>3360767Lmao, have you used one of those canon fuji af adapters, michael j fox could focus faster.
>>3360769Not sure what you're trying to say there, but look at any review in the last 6 months of an mc11 or metabones. They work like native, my mc11 never let me down.
