>>4355238OP here, thanks for commenting, but I don't think you get it at all
What you're describing is not fun
If I wanted to shoot like that and end up with 5 pictures I'd have bought a 4x5 camera already
I walk around, I see something that catches my eye, I fill the finder with it, and if it fits well enough I take my picture
your "technical" critiques also don't make sense, maybe you should leave that out until you get more experience yourself
>Dynamic rangeThey're all edited JPEGs gotten straight from the camera
>CompositionIf you can only tell composition when it's thrown in your face, why are you even trying to comment on it
Start tracing lines of thirds, my autism compels me to make things fit
>Gursky, Adams, in relation to thisNo comment
These are pretty bleh pictures, but I'm not selling them as anything more than what they are
Unfortunately though, what they are is what you make of it
What I make of it is "here are the pretty things I saw in Porto, I've done what I can to make them look how they felt/feel to me"
Have fun declining to shoot in bad light yourself, I'll be cranking my ISO and pushing shadows in my JPEGs, and if it just happens to be golden hour, then all the better :)
Have some chickens with that, just don't compare them to Martin Parr's catalogue
