>>4323879>His own work disproves this.No it doesn't.
You're conflating his artistic choices with image quality.
In fact his body of work looking substantially similar regardless of the camera he uses is EXACTLY THE POINT.
He is the reason his photos look the way they do, not the gear. Almost any camera used correctly will do almost anything you like, and the biggest difference is how hard you have to work to get there.
How many raw photos are currently posted to 4chan, buddy?
>>4323881this