>>4231555At the grifter price it's going for it's bad value. If it's msrp it's great value. I don't care if it looks like a leica, it looks great. I'm objective, I've used an x100v. It's a fantastic travel camera and could have saved myself a ton of weight when I travel. Also that's a film camera anon, I'm talking about a pocketable digital. Only the Ricoh gr series comes close. The Rx1r hasn't been made for years (the last was just a modified a7rii or whatever) and the next closest is m43 shit.
>>4231556Fact, you can use the x100v for things other than Street.
How is it that I can be objective but it's easy for others to just hate so much?
Their flagship aps-c is retarded just like the m43 flagships. It makes no sense and it's for cope users who are stuck to their ecosystem.
Their MF lineup is actually making sense targeting the pro market with tilt shift lenses (and probably the most affordable without using a sinar digital back) phase one is stupid expensive for getting a digital back on a glorified mamiya. But noone here is actually at that level so it isn't even worth talking about. That market is literally rich mainlanders, a few select eurofags who got their job due to wealth and nepotism and americans whos day job consists of architecture for real estate purposes and product photography.
