>>3924643>E-mount is too small for FFYet it's larger than LTM, m39, m42, Nikon f mounts, all of which this has never been an issue for before, it's also larger than the diagonal of a full frame sensor.
Can you explain how a sensor that fits entirely inside the mount doesn't fit please?
>>3924717>Sigma proved that even in the worst case scenario, an f1.2 lens with the last element deep inside the rear of the lens, mount size still isn't an issue for Sony Thanks bud.
Oh, and because I can backup my claims with data, pic related, you think it's a coincidence that the 3 lenses on FE mount have the lowest vignette?
You've. Even trying to push this "Sony mount too small" narrative for years now, yet Sony keeps getting the fastest lenses and best measurements, surely there would be a scrap of data to backup your desperate wants by now?
