>>2689327Not sure why I like this, but I do. The angle and framing make it feel natural.
>>2689417Get the same shot with the sun in a more dramatic position and this could be great
>>2689476Like others have said, not sure how much I like the tilt, would need to compare to a level shot. Sky looks great though. Think I'd like to see a wider angle so the mountain looks more impeding into the city. Great subject, probably a great shot nonetheless.
>>2689486>>2689487Why are these grossly out of focus? The second one makes me want to puke.
>>2689503You did well with what you had but ultimately it's boring.
>>2689506Quite dramatic because of the light, good job.
>>2689509Ends up looking boring, probably because of the angle and too much in the frame.
>>2689519Too out of focus and dark to overcome the limitations of the shot, and not enough to become "artistic"
>>2689520Favourite shot in this thread so far, good use of colour
>>2689588Get closer. There's no need for 3.5 levels in the frame. If you're going for levels and depth you're not using light right.
>>2689592Bad timing and composition. Shot of the street would've been fantastic without the guy blocking the girl and her stall. Your subject choice was poor imo.
>>2689624Says something, which is good, even if it's too edgy. Focus/blur is a bit too prominent, otherwise a great shot.
>>2689633Ruining a great shot with this much invasive saturation is criminal. Tone it back and this is something wonderful.
>>2689636Ultimately boring, and I don't know why. Most likely too much in the frame.
>>2689639Better, still too much in the frame imo.
>>2689674Don't mind the artistic edit, and it would be nicely done if it wasn't so obvious it was added. Tone it down and set it more subtly and naturally and it'll become dramatic/ominous instead of cartoony.
>>2689680You overdid the focus, needs about 30% more depth of field and get rid of the pointless lamp post.
