>>3264433But better gear does take better photos. Good gear is sharp, has low noise, and accurate focus so it quite literally is better. In terms of technical shit, better gear is literally better. Doesn't mean shit if it's still a boring a photo, and changing from digital to film isn't going to change that anymore than upgrading your body. But if you have an interesting photo and the option to use good gear why gimp yourself with shitty gear
>do you edit your photo? do you frame the photo to give it a decent composition? or do you just take snapshits on auto jpg mode and upload your shit right onto whatever forum to keep that "authenticity"I don't even know where to start with this one. How the fuck is framing and proper exposure somehow unauthentic? He just said he looks for light that looks naturally good too. Cameras are still imperfect and editing an image to make it more accurately represent what you saw is completely natural.
