>>3583354Interesting composition held back by an unsharp image. If you get a chance to come back with a tripod, please do so and see if it comes out better. Editing could use a little work, but maybe the composition would look better at a different time of day? Food for thought—maybe when its sunny out, or foggier
>>3583408>>3583409Very nice birb pictures. Very sharp and detailed. Qualty job for a m43 camera, but I expect nothing less from from Leica glass
>>3583540Great use of texture and gestalt principles here, though I wish the dog was more seperated from the background. Perhaps go back with a dodge/burn adjustment and make the dog brighter and the background slightly darker? or opposite. Up to you. Good capture.
>>3583546Its bad because its a blurry, noisy, poorly composed image of a homeless person. Its babbys first street photography. Ask yourself: if I was on the street, how would you feel if a random rich kid with an expensive camera took your picture, while you were literally begging for money/dopefiending? Its ethics. Besides, hes not doing anything interesting (sometimes they do crazy shit like start digging through the sewers for needles or heroin) You can and should do better. Also, some homeless people are psychotic/deranged and homeless for a reason—they're criminals or dangerous. Its best to just leave them alone and pretend they're not there when you're taking pictures.
