>>4497382I just send all mine to a lab and their noritsu. Story time but I originally got into film photography because it had lower start up costs than buying a DSLR and I got to indulge in a bit of vintage mechanical stuff with some neat military/spy connections. So I've never got into DSLR scanning for obvious reasons. Obviously long term it's not a cost saving, but I wasn't sure if I'd enjoy it and now I don't fancy digital because I've grown frustrated with technology.
>>4497409I'm slightly aware of it through reviews but lab scans. I had heard noritsu scanners were particularly bad for it.
>>4497413I'm using the windows photo viewer to "edit" so I'm no master, all mine came out a bit too green (and god knows how they look in reality because my monitors sure aren't calibrated). Can't say I'll be buying the stock again.
>>4497416Oof, if it sucks on overcast days like that I'm not even going to bother. That's 99% of UK weather. Back to Gold 200 for colour I think or maybe 250D (picrel).
>>4497426>dogshit orwo quality controlLiving up to their communist heritage then
