>>4129261>Worst AFFake news. Best Pentax AF to date.
>K-1 had durable articulating screen, newer K-3 III had fixed screenHorses for courses, K-3 III is sports-oriented. It shoots at 12 fps against 4.4 on the K-1 II.
>noise reduction forcibly baked into raws, no way to disableWho cares? Everyone does it to some degree.
>worse image quality than the older KP, no sensor update, just forced NRIn what way is it any worse? If anything, it's beter.
>inexcusably bad video, really AWFUL dynamic range in video (it turns fucking green if you lift the shadows)You shouldn't lift shadows in video unless it's RAW.
>lol no lenses (no, 20 year old designs do not count, a phone has better image quality)fake news
>"magic" weather sealing fails as often as snoy'sfake news
>glitchy AE meteruser error most likely
>All this and you are paying MORE than a sony or (comparable) fuji (pentax can't afford 40mp sensors) user for an objectively WORSE camera with objectively WORSE lenses...Fuji needs 40MP to cope because X-tranny sucks major dick. Sony and Fuji are the worst two brands in the market by far, if any cameras are objectively worse than the rest it's Fuji and Sony. Cheaply made toys.
>Or you could just buy a Nikon and get a better camera with better lenses if you really want a DSLR.Nikon ragequit the DSLR market after getting btfo.
>Still way cheaper than the pencucks lol, but nearly as much as a used full frame camera.Then get an used APS-C camera
>The A7II/A7RII's user interface is pretty bad and the A7III had shutter issue failures. There are no good sony FF cameras under the A7RIII. I recommend you check out fuji and stay with APSC if you don't want to spend more. The only other good option you have is nikon mirrorless.kek, Fuji is the brand to get if you want to spend more. Literally built on fleecing the customer (who is targeted with dumbass designs that only appeal to the kind of retard who'd pay good money for a plastic fantastic)
