>>4158098>What does that make fujiAlso vintage cope, but generally less embarrassing to be seen with because it's associated with the an era that had a diversity of cool photographers and normal people and pros alike used remarkably similar cameras.
DSLRs are associated with the era where normal people rarely had advanced cameras and the real artists weren't shooting $5000 digitals. There are three possible DSLR user stereotypes:
The globe trotting photojournalist (high tier)
The studio snapshitter making magazine cover tier boringness (mid tier)
The event snapper AKA hobbyist that sometimes gets paid (ultra low tier)
This era basically continues today, and the real artists are still using cheaper point and shoots and film. But the DSLR has been replaced by a mirrorless camera that could actually be a step closer to the "normal person's good camera" that used to be common, if it were not for the tumorous lenses that must correct every possible aberration and achieve 70lp/mm on wide open for the one man on earth who prints his 90% bokeh, 10% content shots several feet wide
