>>3509502It's the unprocessed scan of the negative including the film holder. I tweaked the histogram in Silverfast, but that's it.
There is also motion blur causing overall softness, as I shot this at 1/60s and it was a little too slow.
Here's another one from that roll. Posted the processed version (crop to 3:2, unsharpen mask, burning) in the last thread
>>3507188 Still have to get an easel, though.
