>>4234546>18mm f1.4 wrpic not related? that's the f2
>>4235264shots like this are what make it so clear to me that posts that bash the x100v's lens and sensor for softness or bad detail are pure bait or skill issue. realistically how many people are going to be able to notice higher detail than this and what is it going to add to the image? so silly
anyways, nice view. re: composition, the foreground is a bit awkward- how the ledge cuts off on the bottom left