>>4129629The fact that pentax users almost universally praise pic related $600 lens should tell you to ignore pentax users. Niggers told me to buy a K-3 III for low light but the shadows turn purple at ISO 6400 and shooting video makes it overheat despite being a DSLR. No words about it being a camera for the blade runner aesthetic, they actually think it's great. I've never encountered so much straight up lying from any other brand. Smug snobs and assholes, yes, but sony (the people pentaxfags hate the most apparently) guys do tell the truth even though they're assholes about it and Fuji users tell the truth even if they sugarcoat it a little. No word about nikon/canon because those are for real photographers not people who post on gearfag forums.
>When you buy a bad pentax lens: It's literally zeiss tier you idiot if you were a real photographer you'd know its great it has the 3d pop microcontrasts. You don't need more. is this snoy shilling? You don't need ANY sharpness wide open. Retard. Learn to take photos correctly. This is snoy shilling isn't it. No, it's Fuji! Get out, Fuji shill!>When you buy a bad sony lens: That lens sucks poorfag you were meant to buy this $1500 one. When you have 61mp you need the sharpest lens possible. Retard. Why buy sony if you're a poorfag? Poor poor poor buy the 17-400 GM II f0.8. Look at this charts. $4000 but worth it. >When you buy a bad Fuji lens: That lens has optical flaws that create soulful film character but you should buy this one instead if you want sharp photos across the frame, friend. Sometimes I like to take blurry photos on purpose haha.Overall Fuji users are the friendliest and the most level headed about gear here
