>>2991590>Look up some tutorials on how to use a camera. This might have been a cool photo, but unfortunately, you used the wrong settings. 1600 iso, 1/800th sec, f8, no go.I was experimenting and liked the result. What settings would you prefer?
>>2991587>Why is your ISO higher outdoors?I was trying to get more colour sensitivity. Also, lower ISO = less noise in low-light.
>Why are you shooting portraits with a wide angle and putting your subject on the side of the frame and not lighting them properly and including acres of background clutter?Well, the bookshelves are centred in their half and the guy is centred in his. It's not clutter, it's balance, and more realistic that way - and we were in a cafe, after all. And it's not really a portrait, it just has a person in it.
>What compositional rules did you apply to these shots? What options did you consider but discard?I went, more or less, with instinct, not an explicitly reasoned process. I apply my way of drawing to photographs. I didn't just take the photos willy-nilly. What you didn't see is everything I deleted.
>>2991994nice
